Well Bolkonskij, your results are very interesting. Have you ever renewed the heatsink paste before OR - know if someone might have done so before you? I ask because I re-ran tests here last night under a similar ambient room temperature (of 65˚ F) and arrived at very similar readings. Same type of sensor probe as yours, just inserted 1 inch deep into the vent. Check my T1 sensor readings below. Yours are noted in Blue.

The T2 sensor readings above are from an un-sheathed metal temp probe, also ran alongside the T1.


Now, why didn’t mine equal that 84˚ (@10 minutes runtime) which I have been screaming about as… “the sweet spot”? Well, I’m going to lay blame with the ambient air temperature. *Cooler than my original findings (from 2023) when the ambient temperature was 76˚ F. However, now still
much closer to 84˚
than to 100˚F.
Seems that ambient room temperature air of 64˚ to 65˚ being drawn in and blown over a G4 mini’s heatsink might just result in lower temperature readings? And maybe your paste is fine? I’d still like to see pics of your heatsink and the paste when you remove the heatsink AND a clear pic of the die itself, once cleaned. Just to see if there is any evidence of it ever being a
ho-lotta-hotta.
Bolkonskij, have you tried resetting the PRAM? Or once you remove the cover, reset the PMU before even removing the heatsink. OR before any of the above, try booting into target disk mode (holding down the “t” key at boot) just to see if you might get that moving firewire icon on your screen. If not, then the PRAM… and afterwards, maybe the PMU?
Yes indibil, I’d like more results from all G4 Mac mini users… if for nothing more than those individuals getting some sort of bearing on the condition of their heatsink paste. Sounds like another tangential topic that I have been working on that would provide a place for such temps to be posted.
*Also indibil, yes I think your readings were from an “overclocked” G4 mini. AND after our recent discussion concerning your heat-shrink wrapped, metal probe and the possible effects that ambient temperatures can have on more accurate temperature readings, I still have not yet tested insulating the shafts of any long metal probes from ambient temperature interference. Unsheathed shafts do make a difference. [See T2 sensor results above.] Question is, how much of a difference and would foam, partially encased shafts be better than your heat-shrink approach?
As always, more tests!
Best of luck Bski.