Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: highest logic authorized by white xskey?  (Read 120145 times)

macStuff

  • Guest
highest logic authorized by white xskey?
« on: May 15, 2019, 04:08:24 PM »

someone jog my memory please..
will it auth v7? v8?
Logged

Enabler

  • 64 MB
  • ****
  • Posts: 79
Re: highest logic authorized by white xskey?
« Reply #1 on: May 16, 2019, 04:52:35 PM »

1) Logic Pro 7.2.3 running on OSX Tiger 10.4.3 or higher for PPC Mac or Tiger 10.4.4 Intel Mac

2) The XSKey will run everything from Logic 4.8 to 7.2.3 but for version 4.8 (OS9 Only) you will need to make sure you have the special XSKey driver installed.

3) Logic Pro 8 & 9 use just a Serial Number

4) Logic Pro X use Mac App store receipt

5) Buy the White Apple XSKeys as they have all Emagic Products authorized ;D the older Emagic blue version of the XSKey are a cap shoot, who knows what you will get since the owner had to buy all the additional products separately
« Last Edit: May 16, 2019, 05:06:18 PM by Enabler »
Logged

macStuff

  • Guest
Re: highest logic authorized by white xskey?
« Reply #2 on: May 16, 2019, 05:18:45 PM »

thank you Enabler! once again
i guess i'll set up os9/logic 6.4.3 on G4 MDD
& osx/7.2.3 on my G5 i guess
Logged

macStuff

  • Guest
Re: highest logic authorized by white xskey?
« Reply #3 on: May 16, 2019, 08:29:17 PM »

will 7.2.3 run on Leopard/Snow Leopard?
or does it have to be tiger?
im guessing Tiger is best; leopard is ok; and snow leopard is stretching it?
Logged

Enabler

  • 64 MB
  • ****
  • Posts: 79
Re: highest logic authorized by white xskey?
« Reply #4 on: October 13, 2025, 05:09:05 PM »

Yes 7.2.3 will run on snow leopard
Logged

coachla

  • 128 MB
  • ****
  • Posts: 171
Re: highest logic authorized by white xskey?
« Reply #5 on: April 03, 2026, 08:36:30 PM »

It’s been a while since I compared Logic, but running anything audio I found preferable on Snow Leopard because latency can be reduced to near zero, which for remote hosting or standalone applications it is best. The downside is you need Leopard if you want a server to host remote drives for OS9 to access. It’s one or the other. If I needed both I would use Leopard to server and Snow Leopard or Mavericks to remote host on two OSX computers and Ethernet both with my MDD for example. Then the Leopard machine can be a conduit of sorts for everything needing file transfer. Best to keep things simple.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up

Recent Topics