Great Thread guys
Thank You.
Yes, in an OS X or dual boot environment, the dual CPU is the way to go.
Yes, it is, in symmetric multiprocessing systems like those based on Linux/Unix or NT kernels -to name a few- running on high end G5s, X86s or ARMs. But not in a G4, because the system bus can serve well only one CPU, not two, even in the "fast" 166 MHz MDDs. That's why -between other causes- the dual CPU software only show some speed enhancement in PURE CPU task, and those task are very unusual.
In a pure OS 9 environment, there are situations where a user may use one of the supported dual CPU Apps. most of the time, so it is obviously a great advantage to go Dual.
Of course, that's the best idea. If your work heavily rely on task that have a really enhancement in dual CPU, thats the way to go.
I don't have the data now. But you can enjoy an incredible 80% or 90% speed increase with dual CPU encoding MP3 with SoundJam/iTunes, encoding MPEG2 with Apple MPEG2 encoder, or even in Cubase in some workflows, not mine
But in general, a fast ( or overclocked) single is the way to go in the "G4 world", IMHO