yes, it was the 190 GB partition limit the culprit !
now works like a charm.
I had to reinstall almost everything that needed registration (cubase and a bunch of vst plug-ins).
I let you know the result of some 24/96 khz benchmark that I have in mind.
I hope the latency improvement will help a lot.
thanx
- December 12, 2025, 12:58:05 PM
- Welcome, Guest
News:
|
51
on: December 05, 2025, 03:13:09 AM
|
||
| Started by MacTron - Last post by vespertine | ||
|
52
Mac OS 9 Discussion / Mac OS 9, Hacks & Upgrades / Re: Mac OS 9.2.2 Memory Limit of 1.5 GB... Some Answers
on: December 05, 2025, 02:38:22 AM
|
||
| Started by nanopico - Last post by Jubadub | ||
Hi everyone, @ELN Are there Python scripts for creating the "Third limit-breaking ROM", or is any other such tooling available? For example, using your tbxi and tbxi-patches projects like we do for the Mac mini G4 ROM patches, or other similar tooling. If so, we could apply the 1.628 GB RAM limit patches to Rairii's 10.2.1 CPU Software 5.9 version of the ROM, and get even System 7 to move up from 1.5 GB max RAM to 1.628 GB! Both the third-limit breaking ROM and Rairii's ROM are based on the same US Mac OS ROM 10.2.1 with CPU Software 5.9, so most likely it will work! (Nevermind figuring out what to do with so much RAM on System 7. That can wait!) |
||
|
53
on: December 04, 2025, 10:42:54 PM
|
||
| Started by jjuran - Last post by jjuran | ||
Welcome to Mac OS 9 Lives!, @jjuran! Thanks! Sorry for any confusion around the Legacynth alpha download. I've since given up on the MacBinary+ format for general distribution and wrote a SEA shell which is now used for the Legacynth installer: Legacynth https://www.macrelics.com/legacynth/ The current version supports Lode Runner's sound effects... |
||
|
54
on: December 04, 2025, 10:17:57 PM
|
||
| Started by jjuran - Last post by Jubadub | ||
|
Welcome to Mac OS 9 Lives!, @jjuran!
It's great to have you join the fray! Mac OS 9 army grows!For anyone else wondering about the really cool things @jjuran already brought to Mac OS 9, check out this interesting Garden thread. |
||
|
55
on: December 04, 2025, 10:14:23 PM
|
||
| Started by cluster_fsck - Last post by Jubadub | ||
Guy was not pleased using older CodeWarrior versions in the '90s alongside CVS, apparently: Hey, great to have you here as well, @jjuran! Thanks for porting Git to Mac OS 9 one way or another. ![]() Just an idea, but do you think you could record a short video capture of this whole process? I would love to see it in action! I think it'd also encourage people to use Git and your other ideas on Mac OS more, that's an excellent workflow. |
||
|
56
on: December 04, 2025, 07:04:36 PM
|
||
| Started by cluster_fsck - Last post by jjuran | ||
I'm starting to develop some new projects and attempting to do all the coding on my old 7100/80. In case you missed it, Git *is* an option, in MacRelix: https://www.macrelix.org/ |
||
|
57
on: December 04, 2025, 07:00:23 PM
|
||
| Started by cluster_fsck - Last post by jjuran | ||
Guy was not pleased using older CodeWarrior versions in the '90s alongside CVS, apparently: I use Metrowerks C++ 2.4.1 from CodeWarrior Pro 6.3, by way of MPW's ToolServer, driven by Apple event from MacRelix. Some of my code also builds with CW Pro 4 (the last version hosted on 68K). I've written my own post-linkers (which run in MacRelix) to remove the dependency on StripAddress() in Metrowerks' runtime code. The last time I spoke Pascal was 2002, and that time I was getting paid for it. :-) Git 2.2.2 indeed ships with MacRelix. I wouldn't recommend using it with massive repositories like metamage_1.git (except natively in Mac OS X), but it should be fine with small repos. It still needs integration with a pager and an editor, though. (I mainly use it as a read-only client for Jaguar.) |
||
|
58
on: December 04, 2025, 05:56:43 PM
|
||
| Started by jjuran - Last post by jjuran | ||
|
Hi,
I'm the developer of Advanced Mac Substitute, MacRelix, and most recently Legacynth. I target pretty much all versions of Mac OS (as well as POSIX generally), and I write tools to make this more practical. I primarily write in C++, Perl, and Varyx, though I just started learning Objective-C. I use Git. I tend to work mostly on 201x-era Macs, using SheepShaver with Mac OS 8.1 or 9 to run Metrowerks C++ through MPW's ToolServer for building classic programs. This year I started replaying TaskMaker. :-) |
||
|
59
Mac OS 9 Discussion / Mac OS 9 on Unsupported Hardware / Re: System 7 natively boots on the Mac mini G4!
on: December 04, 2025, 11:51:11 AM
|
||
| Started by Jubadub - Last post by Jubadub | ||
|
OK, this came out sooner than expected... Or should I say, this was never truly expected.
I'm posting this on all 3 Mac communities I put the original post in, because it's that much of a big deal. Many of us know System 7.1.2 was the first ever version of Mac OS to support PowerPC-based Macintoshes... ... Yet we couldn't go below System 7.5. Until a day ago: ![]() Rairii just released not only an update to his System Enabler for System 7.5 ~ Mac OS 7.6.1, but also a separate patching effort of the same System Enabler to get System 7.1.x booting. So this achievement alone is BEYOND newsworthy... ... But it doesn't stop there. No. You'd think a PURE 68k OS wouldn't boot in PowerPC in bare-metal: ![]() System 7.1.1... ![]() ... And System 7.1. "To boldly go where no PowerMac has ever gone before." This is precisely what we theorized earlier, and the thoughts we entertained: with Apple's 68k emulator residing in the Mac OS ROM file, we now have the LATEST version of said 68k-to-PPC CPU instruction converter, making ALL OF 68k run as if it was no different than a Java runtime, with "68k bytecode", if you will. A whole OS done that way.And guess what? System 7.1 is so light, so fast, I cannot even SEE the "Welcome to Power Macintosh" screen or any of the Extensions loading, because they all just load INSTANTLY. If you blink for even a moment, you WILL miss all of it. It got to the point that the OS is so light, what takes the "longest" to load is the Mac OS ROM itself! You know that finished loading after you are past the Happy Mac part. Anyway... There some points about these achievements I'd like to clarify: - The OSes seem to pair with the Finder as follows: System 7.1 Finder 7.1, System 7.1.1 Finder 7.1.3, System 7.1.2 (and 7.1.2P) Finder 7.1.4. Note that System 7.5 is also paired with Finder 7.1.4; - Systems 7.1.1 ~ 7.1.2P aren't able to run their Finders (crash+reopen Finder eternal loop), but if we swap them in with Finder 7.1, it all works, which is how I took those screenshots (Rairii figured this out first, as well); - Systems 7.1.1 comes with its various own "System Enablers". You must delete them first so they don't intervene with Rairii's Enabler, as it's all System 7.1.1 needs. If you don't, you will see this instead. If you do, and please correct me if I'm mistaken, it seems like Rairii's Enabler gets its Resource Fork updated to also error out like this even after you got rid of the other, pesky enablers (I did an MD5 check for both forks to confirm). So if that happens, unpack Rairii's Enabler anew and discard the old one; - System 7.1.2 (7.1.2P untested) is just like 7.1.1 in that it comes with its own Enabler that you need to get rid of first, in order not to face the same issue. In this case, it's called the "PowerPC Enabler"; - I could boot all these OSes with all Extensions on. I did get this and this as warning messages, though, after boot, at least with System 7.1.2; - Funnily enough, System 7.5 has the same Finder 7.1.4 as System 7.1.2(P), but there are no issues with it there. Likewise, System 7.1.2(P) is fine with a different Finder. The problem only materializes when both are present simultaneously, but not individually. Incidentally, Finder 7.1.3 on System 7.1.2(P) will also have the same issue, as will the Finder that came with System 7.5, hence why we settle for Finder 7.1 (there are no Finder version 7.1.1 and 7.1.2 that I could find). I think that's about it. So to highlight one of the interesting features of e.g. System 7.1.2P, it is the latest version of the OS that is still able to format disks as MFS. Nearly all of the later System 7 versions can both read from and write to existing MFS disks, but not format one anew. (So a Mac mini G4 CD for 7.1.2P could, one day, be theoretically cool to have. It is also a relatively popular System 7 version choice by many.) There's also one more thing: Personally, I never really coexisted much with Mac OS before the System 7.5.x era. So I can't say what should be or should not be working at this point anymore... And I could use more people exploring this together with me. But what I can say is that System 7.1.x was almost as stable as the 7.5 and later counterparts on the Mac mini G4 1.5 GHz model (this hardware is so overkill). Most apps ran, but some, such as "The Teleporting Inchworm" (my personal choice of basic System features benchmark in this project) no longer runs (and freezes the OS). But maybe it was never meant to run on System 7.1 to begin with? Some might now be wondering, "What about System 7.0 and 7.0.1?". From what I understood, System 7.1.x used a different "format" for its System Enablers compared to 7.5.x and 7.6.x, which is why we now have 2 different Enablers, but it seems no version of Mac OS before 7.1 is even aware of System Enabler files at all! (So-called "gibblies" or "gbly" type.) So... yeah. Only time can tell what happens or not after this! As always, many thanks to Rairii for yet another groundbreaking update! The latest enablers can be found in his GitHub project page, as per usual, which are also mirrored here in the Garden for both archival and easier access from Mac OS itself. Make sure to check the release notes for details. This time around, the Mac OS ROMs are the same as the previous release, so nothing new there to think about. |
||
|
60
Mac OS 9 Discussion / Mac OS 9 on Unsupported Hardware / Re: System 7 natively boots on the Mac mini G4!
on: December 04, 2025, 11:47:39 AM
|
||
| Started by Jubadub - Last post by Jubadub | ||
|
Awesome, @RossDarker!
Just like with Mac OS 9.2.2, now it feels like the mini has officially stepped into Mac OS 7.6.1 territory!Many thanks for getting this ready and set up! |
||
It's great to have you join the fray! Mac OS 9 army grows!


