Mac OS 9 Lives

Digital Audio Workstation & MIDI => Audio & MIDI Hardware => Topic started by: paulkeeley on July 01, 2025, 02:41:51 AM

Title: M-Audio FireWire 410 and FireWire Audiophile on a PowerBook Pismo 400 no-go
Post by: paulkeeley on July 01, 2025, 02:41:51 AM
As the previous M-Audio FW thread (https://macos9lives.com/smforum/index.php?topic=6942) has now been locked, I'm continuing my saga here.

I've now been able to get both a FW Audiophile and a FW 410 downgraded to run the latest available OS9 drivers and have them recognized on my PowerBook Pismo 400.

Here's the process which works for both devices (requires a G4 running OSX, max 10.4.11):


However...
Here's the issue I have experienced running OS 9.2.1 on my PowerBook G3 Pismo 400:

The audio output has regular periodic glitchy audio spikes every second. This happens regardless of whether I use Firewire bus power or mains power, regardless of which FireWire port I use on the back, and regardless of which FireWire 400 cable I use - I have tried multiple known-good cables. I have tried using the Macintosh audio system and ASIO drivers. No matter what, the same glitches occur - even on a fresh OS install.


So, it appears that both of these devices are a no-go on the Pismo 400, at least using the built-in FireWire ports. I have yet to try a PCMCIA FireWire card to see if that works (trying to source a compatible one for cheap). If anyone has had any successful experience with this particular configuration, please do let me know! It would be great to be able to do some multi-channel recording on the little tuxedo. As it stands, I now have two very stylish paperweights... although they do at least work on the PowerBook G4…
Title: Re: M-Audio FireWire 410 & FireWire Audiophile / PowerBook Pismo 400
Post by: aBc on July 01, 2025, 07:55:44 AM
As both the M-Audio FW410… and the M-Audio Audiophile note the same basic system requirements of a 500 MHz CPU, could this possibly be the root cause of the problem you’re having? Initially I considered (as did you) the possibility of a bad cable — but then upon reading that you encountered no problems with the same configuration on the PowerBook G4, it seemed a sole problem with the Pismo 400.

[Knezzen mentioned previously that he’d had prior success with a Pismo 500.]

Perhaps trimming all unnecessary extensions, control panels, etc. from your Pismo 400 might possibly alleviate or reduce the problems somewhat and allow you improved performance with both the FW 410 and the Audiophile? Anything to reduce the primary basic demands on your Pismo’s CPU — which might then enable more suitable results with the Pismo 400.

What CPU present in your G4 Powerbook? 500 MHz or greater?


Thanks for the FireWire_OSX_1_6_Build_1174.zip attachment!
Title: Re: M-Audio FireWire 410 and FireWire Audiophile on a PowerBook Pismo 400 no-go
Post by: paulkeeley on July 01, 2025, 09:48:01 AM
Aha - I was not aware of the 500mhz minimum requirement! That would certainly explain the issue, since I don't have the 500Mhz upgrade in my Pismo 400. Hard to imagine 100mhz would make that much of a difference, but doing a comparison on everymac, it seems that the cache bus speed is also higher on the 500: 200Mhz vs 160Mhz. So, those two factors may well be enough.

Guess I'll pause my pursuit of FW audio on the Pismo until I can find a speedier one!
Title: Re: M-Audio FireWire 410 & FireWire Audiophile / PowerBook Pismo 400
Post by: ssp3 on July 01, 2025, 10:32:40 AM
Thanks for the FireWire_OSX_1_6_Build_1174.zip attachment!

One has to wonder where did he get it?  ;)
https://macos9lives.com/smforum/index.php?topic=6942.msg58696#msg58696
Title: Re: M-Audio FireWire 410 and FireWire Audiophile on a PowerBook Pismo 400 no-go
Post by: indibil on July 01, 2025, 09:20:42 PM
Aha - I was not aware of the 500mhz minimum requirement! That would certainly explain the issue, since I don't have the 500Mhz upgrade in my Pismo 400. Hard to imagine 100mhz would make that much of a difference, but doing a comparison on everymac, it seems that the cache bus speed is also higher on the 500: 200Mhz vs 160Mhz. So, those two factors may well be enough.

Guess I'll pause my pursuit of FW audio on the Pismo until I can find a speedier one!

https://68kmla.org/bb/index.php?threads/just-overclocked-my-pismo.23546/ (https://68kmla.org/bb/index.php?threads/just-overclocked-my-pismo.23546/)

https://web.archive.org/web/20080224053124/http://www.bekkoame.ne.jp/~t-imai/pbg3e3.html (https://web.archive.org/web/20080224053124/http://www.bekkoame.ne.jp/~t-imai/pbg3e3.html)