Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1
Thank you for the explanation, laulandn! Do not try to pace yourself, let loose your chaotic brain on the forum. If people are not interested they will just read other threads. There are many nerds that share your interests here.
2
CPU Upgrades / Re: The 1.6ghz Sonnet Encore MDX overclocking project
« Last post by GaryN on Today at 03:35:10 PM »
@GaryN That's a good point with regards to the processor height difference in the MDX, in terms of getting the copper heatsink to do its job properly. However, you should still be able to use it properly for both CPUs if you add copper shims (one or multiple). Using 7448 and 7457 processors, and/or interposer boards, instead of the usual 7447 or 7455 with MDX and stock daughtercards also leads to those kinds of height concerns. The opposite is also true: Washers/spacers also help with when the CPUs are too high for the heatsink. Quoting one of my linked comments:

I'm afraid you misunderstand the problem. Height has nothing to do with it.

The procs on the MDX board are in a different position than the Apple boards. If you look at the pic, you can see the contact surface is just large enought to cover the procs and transfer the heat up the pipes.
The white rectangles are the location of the original 7450s on the Apple boards. The red are the 7447s on the MDX. The problem is obvious.

(Nitpickers: Don't hold me to absolute exact-ness here. I'm not 100% certain that this is exactly where the procs align. This is only from memory but it clearly makes the point. I would have to pull the MDX out of my MDD to check precisely where they land and I'm not going to do that.)
3
CPU Upgrades / Re: The 1.6ghz Sonnet Encore MDX overclocking project
« Last post by DieHard on Today at 01:42:12 PM »
Quote
What's equally as remarkable is that you would think after all that, the G5 would have been whisper-quiet. Oops…

Yeah, not only "noisy" but some of them were liquid cooled and to add to Apple's incredible track-record of "Think different" "Design Different" and sometimes "Screw the customer over with a different design" the liquid-cooled G5s were dying left and right in music studios due to leaks... from the web...

Quote
    "I have a lab of 17 Dual 2.7Ghz G5s that are all now leaking their coolant- all at once. A significant number are dead in the water and the rest are just holding on right now. Symptoms are wide-ranged but will include fans spinning wildly, machines shutting down when they heat up, greenish liquid leaking from the case, and if you are able to look, crystalized liquid forming where the CPU meets the heatsink as well as corrosion of all the metal surrounding the CPU module. Eventually, the machines just stop working altogether necessitating a replacement of CPU, Logic Board, Power Supply, and two smaller parts. In one case the power supply started to shoot off black smoke and then died.

    "As of yet, Apple has been fairly unresponsive in fixing or replacing them and I am now working on making this more public. I am curious to know if any other people are having this problem. I know of 3 other cases outside our own lab here. The machines in our lab were the first of the dual 2.7s- they were bought right when the came out."

I can tell you as an Apple-tech in the field in 2005 thru 2007, it was mind blowing to see $3500+ music studio and graphics studio machines with blown logic boards, and for added insult, the power supply was at the bottom, so, 4 out of 5 dead G5s had blown power supplies also; I can tell you this was NOT a "one-off"... I am just one guy, and I personally inspected a few dozen that leaked !  Man it was ugly... white liquid trails running into CPU sockets, blown logic boards, and then a small trail going directly into the Power supply, I almost didn't have the heart to show the client that forked over big bucks, the absolute destruction of their workhorse from just being used like a computer should be.  Many were clean as a whistle with no dust and very little use and BAMMM, death.  As irony and Apple go hand in hand, the slower and cheaper 2.3 was still air cooled and there are probably a lot of them still alive today, and also the single CPU models, but the most of the dual 2.5 or 2.7 units died in epic fashion.

This is probably Apple's worst "screw-over" to date, by never officially making a re-call... and just saying in 2006/2007 at the very height of the number of leak failures, "Hey sweet client, this new intel Mac pro is better than those shitty G5s in about 10 ways, so order now"

Talk about tangling a carrot, and wanting everyone to move on... I can say, that if you weigh acoustics, expand ability, reliability, and power, they finally got it right with the cheese-grater Mac Pro; it's just a shame so many valued customers had to pay a ton of cash for Apple's own G5 mistakes before the Mac Pro.
4
I know that it is a "recent" model and so, no driver for OS 9 but … they say that it is HID compliant … I wonder how much it is HID compliant …

Check this Iiyama ProLite T1521MSC-B1 :)

I can try to get my mini G4 at work to try a Iiyama touch screen we use to check the behaviour of OS 9 with them.
5
Hardware / Re: Copper heatsink G4 mini
« Last post by indibil on Today at 08:00:56 AM »
Maybe call it an "iSink"… after indibil’s original approach? ;D

It isn’t pretty (yet) but the first “replicant” here is finally complete.

Very good job @aBc. Keep in mind that this heatsink, in addition to being made of copper, which greatly improves conduction, has a better construction than the original, which if you look closely, is a thin aluminum base, with INSERTED fins, which worsens conduction compared to that they were part of the same block.

Maybe you have a few less fins because I bought a 50x50 heatsink and yours was 50x100, and in the manufacturing process it may have a lower density of fins, but don't worry, the original heatsink is ridiculous, I don't even know how it dissipates. And a heatsink with pipelines is only a way to reduce costs, an entire block of copper conducts heat much better.

https://youtu.be/IiA4dH-3-EU?si=OAdjYYZ088SbCUuN


Maybe this heatsink should be called "aBsink", if my bad English doesn't make it sound bad :)
6
New Member Welcome / Re: Finally after many years I get a real Mac OS9 mac!
« Last post by ssp3 on Today at 02:29:39 AM »
Welcome to the Club!

Quote
I messed about with USB and FW drives before learning that neither of these will boot!

Some FW enclosures will. Check my posts on this subject. ;)
7
Heyho. So here I am with a Mac Mini (1.5Ghz) running (nearly) Mac OS9!

I started my Mac career getting on for three decades ago with a lab Quadra. Then two decades ago I did a temporary support job that involved getting a G3 with dual boot OS X/Mac OS9. That lead me into full time Mac usage. But then Intel beckoned and for some time my only Mac OS9 access was virtual (Executor, then Sheep Shaver). Some for just play, but there's a little app that I need every few years or so and for that I have a Mac OS8.6 VM via Sheep Shaver.

During this time my only PPC Mac was a unbootable MDD that I finally lost patience with six months ago and gave it away. But now I find my way to this forum and immediately onto ebay to find a suitable Mac Mini. I bought what I thought was a 1.42Ghz one. Turns out its optical drive is broken (the case is currently off and to eject you need to move the bar upwards) and it's actually a 1.5Ghz one but it has twice the RAM of the listing (1Gb).

I messed about with USB and FW drives before learning that neither of these will boot! Then onto CDs until I found that 700Mb ones are not recognised in this drive. Whilst waiting for ebay to deliver me some 650Mb CDrs I used SuperDuper to create a USB bootable external drive, then when booted from that drive I used iBored to put the v9 installer CD image to the internal drive. I guess now I need to slow down and wait for those CDrs. But I already find myself reading the thread on using a mSATA disk via a SATA/IDE adaptor...! Cracking. Thank you to all who have spent so much time on this. Cheers Ferg
9
Hardware / Re: Copper heatsink G4 mini
« Last post by Jubadub on Today at 12:23:19 AM »
Maybe call it an "iSink"… after indibil’s original approach? ;D

It isn’t pretty (yet) but the first “replicant” here is finally complete.

"like"

:)

"like" :D
10
Hardware / Re: Copper heatsink G4 mini
« Last post by ssp3 on Yesterday at 11:31:31 PM »
"like"

:)

"don't like" you quoting the whole @abc's post.
 >:(
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10