Author Topic: Roland/Dinaware Ballade 1.11  (Read 20758 times)

supernova777

  • Guest
Re: Roland/Dinaware Ballade 1.11
« Reply #20 on: December 24, 2014, 02:50:23 PM »
I have Roland's Virtual Sound Canvas VSC-88 whereby an external MIDI sound module is not
necessary. VSC-88 is compatible with both the General MIDI System
and the GS format, and can play back music files created for them. I realize that the VSC-88 can only be used as a sound source to play back midi and Ballade generated files.

http://web.archive.org/web/19980703234232/http://www2.edirol.com/vsc88h.html

Offline MacGuy

  • Veteran Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 107
  • Love MacOS9Lives
Re: Roland/Dinaware Ballade 1.11
« Reply #21 on: February 19, 2015, 09:51:21 PM »
Roland/Dinaware Ballade 1.11:

http://macos9lives.com/smforum/index.php?topic=986.0

Info, Tips & Trics here...

I had to trash and  re-install OS 9 and all my programmes due to a catastrophic OS 9 hard drive crash. 

When i installed Ballade 1.11 obtained from the above noted download site and launched the app it requested a S/N.  I can't recall doing this the last time i installed Ballade.

What are the magic numbers please ?

LC520(my first iMac @ 25 MHz ), 8500/SonnetG4, Performa6360, QuickSilver PowerPC G4 ( 933MHz ), iMac PowerPC G3 500 MHz ,iMac @ 3.06 GHz, AND a plethora of midi/audio/recording gear and software and oh! let's not forget all those acoustical music instruments

supernova777

  • Guest
Re: Roland/Dinaware Ballade 1.11
« Reply #22 on: February 19, 2015, 10:14:38 PM »
2004100460 (v1.0)

Offline geforceg4

  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 535
  • i did my time on mac os 9
Re: Roland/Dinaware Ballade 1.11
« Reply #23 on: August 25, 2016, 10:01:45 PM »

Offline geforceg4

  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 535
  • i did my time on mac os 9
Re: Roland/Dinaware Ballade 1.11
« Reply #24 on: October 25, 2016, 06:42:28 AM »

Offline MacTron

  • Global Moderator
  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2116
  • keep it simple
Re: Roland/Dinaware Ballade 1.11
« Reply #25 on: October 25, 2016, 07:45:59 AM »
An  IBM/PC version existed, for MS/DOS only, and it was less capable than the Mac one.
Please don't PM about things that are not private.