Author Topic: Flashed SiL3112 QuickBench results?  (Read 1404 times)

Offline FBz

  • Moderator
  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 666
  • Fury-Fungus FdB/FBz
Flashed SiL3112 QuickBench results?
« on: February 26, 2023, 07:06:33 AM »
It has been stated that ONLY the flashed SiL3112-based
SATA Controller cards will boot OS 9 - a question remains:

What sort of performance can be attained with these cards?
(Requesting QuickBench results from your card.)

Does your SiL3112-based card now surpass these results?
Please, do post your results along with SSD type & size.


*Above “baseline” results via QuickBench 1.5

Offline Borgmac

  • Enthusiast Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 41
  • New Member
Re: Flashed SiL3112 QuickBench results?
« Reply #1 on: March 02, 2023, 02:07:04 PM »
Ok, it's not a 3112 but a 3114, but here are my results
Picture 7 is on PowerMac G5 1.6 Ghz, SSD Inland connected to Inloon adapter and to Ultra ATA/100 (connection of the CD Drive)
Picture 8 is PowerMac G5 1.6 Ghz, SSD Inland connected to PCI SATA SIL 3114 card with SIL3114CTU and SST39Sf010A, flashed and in a PCI slot 33MHz 64 bit.

Not a big difference actually...

DO not hesitate to come back to me if you want any other information.


Offline Borgmac

  • Enthusiast Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 41
  • New Member
Re: Flashed SiL3112 QuickBench results?
« Reply #2 on: March 02, 2023, 02:33:33 PM »
Just for comparison, the same Inland SSD connected to the standard G5 SATA connector, 1.5 Gbps...

« Last Edit: March 02, 2023, 02:44:00 PM by Borgmac »

Offline FBz

  • Moderator
  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 666
  • Fury-Fungus FdB/FBz
Re: Flashed SiL3112 QuickBench results?
« Reply #3 on: March 15, 2023, 07:46:13 AM »
Results from the converted SiL3112 SATA controller card (equipped with the flashed AM29F010 EEPROM).