Author Topic: in praise of Bias Peak's Samplerate Change  (Read 3617 times)

Offline Syn-Fi

  • Veteran Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 151
  • Quadra 700, G4 MDD, Mac mini
in praise of Bias Peak's Samplerate Change
« on: November 08, 2018, 04:37:32 AM »

Bias Peak 5.2 appears to have a very intensive Samplerate change algorithm that can take 1h30mins at 'level 10 quality' to convert 20 minutes of 24bit 48khz audio to 44khz on a G4 MDD 1.25ghz

But it is worth it and i have not been satisfied with Soundforge or other tools for this purpose.

attached whitepaper.

Offline IIO

  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4439
  • just a number
Re: in praise of Bias Peak's Samplerate Change
« Reply #1 on: November 08, 2018, 05:13:52 PM »
i was always wondering what it is doing. barbabatch was usually the tool of choice for pro audio.
insert arbitrary signature here

Offline cyberish

  • Veteran Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 131
  • new to the forums
Re: in praise of Bias Peak's Samplerate Change
« Reply #2 on: November 09, 2018, 12:04:33 AM »
interesting... - and this 5.2 version would be better than the algos in version 6?

Offline Syn-Fi

  • Veteran Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 151
  • Quadra 700, G4 MDD, Mac mini
Re: in praise of Bias Peak's Samplerate Change
« Reply #3 on: November 09, 2018, 01:44:08 AM »
hi,

ver 6 retains this function and i have ver 6 on Mac Mini i7, so i should test how quick it is on that setup with the algorithm set to '10' in preferences. 

Samplerate change is particularly important given how many people record at higher sample rates to edge up Nyquist but then need to downsample for CD or for vintage samplers.

PowR3 dither is also on Bias and i prefer this dither when i'm dropping from 24bit to 16bit.


Offline IIO

  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4439
  • just a number
Re: in praise of Bias Peak's Samplerate Change
« Reply #4 on: November 09, 2018, 02:05:47 AM »
i havent read the paper, did he set up something custom?

i am under the impression that 4 times upsampling and using bicubic interpolation should give perfect results already.

my personal "trick" was always to avoid rates which are not multiples of 44.1.
insert arbitrary signature here