delicate bending

[IIO]

have you compared against my paf-modulator yet?

[IIO]

https://cycling74.com/forums/re-patching-old-externals/

[dr bu]

Like to see it very much. Do you happen to have it in 4.1?

[IIO]

i mostyl post in 4.x to the forums. you only need to remove the .mxb file extension.

[IIO]

your bell curve looks ok and there ius also signal output at your lookup table. no idea why the frequecnies would be wrong.

the only thing i noticed is that your buffer doesnt initialize on load. i am also unsure why, the patch seems right.

[IIO]

i found out that macminis make a great standalone synth when you know max.

[dr bu]

 

[IIO]

time to reboot.

[dr bu]

Guess so my friend ..but what does it imply technically?  I've never seen this message regarding any other program. Is there a way to avoid this type of crash?

[IIO]

it should (i.e. unless something went really, really wrong) imply that the MacOS thinks the app is still open.

i have seen that once, but cant remember in what context or with which program it was.

quitting an app with a third party process killer which doesnt work right could cause that, or maybe faulty RAM, i am not sure what in OS9 is whatching open processes and i dont think one can refresh that info other than rebooting.

it´s ok now or did it come back?

[IIO]

in osx there is a "list of open files" which doesnt make a difference between executables, documents and for examples disk images (you may have seen that before when putting a file from a toast image or dmg into the trash and attempt to empty it)

in OS9 i think it is different, there must be something like a "process watcher".

next time you see this, check what system profiler & co say about currently running processes.

[dr bu]

.. its OK.  My Titan Mactron recover cd system SSD is inclined to this.  Not the Gigabit Ethernet swedish 9.2.2 15 years IDEATA whatever though. So what to look for in System profiler i don't get..

[IIO]

as long as it is not your max patch all is good.

[dr bu]

hmm...

[dr bu]

...what would be the best setup for running Max do you think?  or which is yours?

[dr bu]

Got myself new glasses today.

[IIO]

hard to tell.

since dual processor support started with 4.6 for OS) only any single processor G4 with cache should be fine.

the machines without cache such as the 733 and some powerbooks get deep in trouble with some FFT tasks and certain third party objects.

my main computers are a 933 and a dual 1.25 "native". i use mostly the single processor machine.

when you have GUI stuff runnning and the high priority thread is on, it feels fine up to 25% CPU for audio processing, and imagery and jitter stuff stops working at about 80% audio CPU.

at a vectorsize of 32, that is.

...

my reference machine for pluggo projects / single DSP applications used to be the titanium powerbook 400.

90% there is like 20% on the 933.

[dr bu]

...

[IIO]

hjälp, hjälp!

[Protools5LEGuy]

...what would be the best setup for running Max do you think?  or which is yours?

1.25GHz Mini yet to arrive and already considering
overclocking to 1.5 and a larger than 80mb HD.

i´ve got a 1,25 1,33 and 1,42 here, the 1.5 silent upgrade is hard to find (and i am not sure if 5.5% are worth the hassle.)

the 1.5 is aboputt as rare as the mini server and sellers asking for fantasy prices.

Cant wait to see what that MAX Farm running can do !