Author Topic: delicate bending  (Read 11310 times)

Offline dr bu

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 213
  • inconsistent soul
Re: delicate bending
« Reply #75 on: October 03, 2017, 03:04:14 AM »
Got myself new glasses today.
bending is tuning

Offline IIO

  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1998
  • new to the forums
Re: delicate bending
« Reply #76 on: October 11, 2017, 11:34:28 AM »
hard to tell.

since dual processor support started with 4.6 for OS) only any single processor G4 with cache should be fine.

the machines without cache such as the 733 and some powerbooks get deep in trouble with some FFT tasks and certain third party objects.

my main computers are a 933 and a dual 1.25 "native". i use mostly the single processor machine.

when you have GUI stuff runnning and the high priority thread is on, it feels fine up to 25% CPU for audio processing, and imagery and jitter stuff stops working at about 80% audio CPU.

at a vectorsize of 32, that is.

...

my reference machine for pluggo projects / single DSP applications used to be the titanium powerbook 400.

90% there is like 20% on the 933.
"It is true that the "pre-emptive multitasking" advantage present in OS X can be illustrated by downloading CD-ROM ISOs and rendering chaos theory formulas while simultaneously instant messaging and posting on FaceBook what you ate... but in reality, what did you create?"
- DieHard, random forum troll at macos9lives.com

Offline dr bu

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 213
  • inconsistent soul
Re: delicate bending
« Reply #77 on: February 21, 2018, 09:03:31 PM »
...
bending is tuning

Offline IIO

  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1998
  • new to the forums
Re: delicate bending
« Reply #78 on: March 31, 2018, 02:21:56 PM »
hjälp, hjälp! :P
"It is true that the "pre-emptive multitasking" advantage present in OS X can be illustrated by downloading CD-ROM ISOs and rendering chaos theory formulas while simultaneously instant messaging and posting on FaceBook what you ate... but in reality, what did you create?"
- DieHard, random forum troll at macos9lives.com

Offline Protools5LEGuy

  • Global Moderator
  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2183
Re: delicate bending
« Reply #79 on: April 03, 2018, 11:55:32 AM »
...what would be the best setup for running Max do you think?  or which is yours?
1.25GHz Mini yet to arrive and already considering
overclocking to 1.5 and a larger than 80mb HD. :o

i´ve got a 1,25 1,33 and 1,42 here, the 1.5 silent upgrade is hard to find (and i am not sure if 5.5% are worth the hassle.)

the 1.5 is aboputt as rare as the mini server and sellers asking for fantasy prices.

Cant wait to see what that MAX Farm running can do !

 :o
Looking for MacOS 9.2.4

Offline IIO

  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1998
  • new to the forums
Re: delicate bending
« Reply #80 on: April 03, 2018, 12:05:16 PM »
my current "max farm" is an XServe 8x2,25 Xeon and i can tell you it can do a LOT (compared to a G4!)

with its dual gigabit network you can control it with OSC or IPMidi easily when used a music instrument - but of course i mostly use it to render stuff offline.

first thing i will do with a working-audio OS9-mini is releated to tokio rather than max. or a combination of both? :P
« Last Edit: April 04, 2018, 05:53:42 AM by IIO »
"It is true that the "pre-emptive multitasking" advantage present in OS X can be illustrated by downloading CD-ROM ISOs and rendering chaos theory formulas while simultaneously instant messaging and posting on FaceBook what you ate... but in reality, what did you create?"
- DieHard, random forum troll at macos9lives.com

Offline dr bu

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 213
  • inconsistent soul
Re: delicate bending
« Reply #81 on: April 04, 2018, 12:43:18 AM »
hjälp, hjälp! :P

Right, thats the hotline IIO-button/menu. Not fully implemented yet.
bending is tuning

Offline IIO

  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1998
  • new to the forums
Re: delicate bending
« Reply #82 on: April 08, 2018, 05:08:58 PM »
tomorrow a bunch of small audio IOs arrive here, and i will start setting up an OS9 mini with max & co.
"It is true that the "pre-emptive multitasking" advantage present in OS X can be illustrated by downloading CD-ROM ISOs and rendering chaos theory formulas while simultaneously instant messaging and posting on FaceBook what you ate... but in reality, what did you create?"
- DieHard, random forum troll at macos9lives.com

Offline IIO

  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1998
  • new to the forums
Re: delicate bending
« Reply #83 on: September 08, 2018, 01:14:42 PM »
i deleted the above paf patches.

1. the naming scheme was weird; the phase is not the carrier, it is the phase.
"carrier" and "modulator" are now properly used as specified by the ucsd.edu tutorial.

2. phase of master phasor can be reset at audio rate now, so that you can synchronize many oscillators of the same (or different) frequencies.

3.  included alternative layout using single connections between the modules in the "-x" versions of the patches. see example file.

use the "-x" ones as default; only go back to the multiple-inlet versions when you have trouble with the "-x"  stuff.

(the zip is made in OS9 using stuff it - for OS9 pls remove the .mxb)
« Last Edit: September 08, 2018, 01:39:00 PM by IIO »
"It is true that the "pre-emptive multitasking" advantage present in OS X can be illustrated by downloading CD-ROM ISOs and rendering chaos theory formulas while simultaneously instant messaging and posting on FaceBook what you ate... but in reality, what did you create?"
- DieHard, random forum troll at macos9lives.com

Offline dr bu

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 213
  • inconsistent soul
Re: delicate bending
« Reply #84 on: September 09, 2018, 12:04:53 AM »
Ok.. interesting  :)
bending is tuning

Offline IIO

  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1998
  • new to the forums
Re: delicate bending
« Reply #85 on: September 09, 2018, 01:34:57 AM »
eventually it is a bit confusing to use note numbers (or actually: numbers of notes) for the bandwidth. you might want to use octaves instead.
"It is true that the "pre-emptive multitasking" advantage present in OS X can be illustrated by downloading CD-ROM ISOs and rendering chaos theory formulas while simultaneously instant messaging and posting on FaceBook what you ate... but in reality, what did you create?"
- DieHard, random forum troll at macos9lives.com

Offline dr bu

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 213
  • inconsistent soul
Re: delicate bending
« Reply #86 on: September 09, 2018, 04:16:21 AM »
puckette made [formant~] back in `95 (found in IRCAM PMA-lib) presenting "live formant tracking"!
i want to feed its output (3 formants) into pafs and fofs but helpfile is way over my head.   >:(

your nomenclature is impressive. it does not always suit my needs, but i steal what i can.   ;D
bending is tuning

Offline IIO

  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1998
  • new to the forums
Re: delicate bending
« Reply #87 on: September 09, 2018, 07:29:32 AM »
i dont think i ever used that, if it is for the FOF object then it is very oldschool.

however, i have tried to make the two available vowel libraries work with the PAF long ago - and it is not so easy.

the IRCAM one only works with partials and has no bandwidth parameter, and the CSound database has bandwidth - but less vowels.

you can try to use my new helpfile and apply 3-formant vowel data to it, you will see that it doesnt work until you start to freely scale the data.

and of course, if you apply soprano vowels to you filters/partials/fof/paf, make sure you only play base frequencies in the correct range. :)

"It is true that the "pre-emptive multitasking" advantage present in OS X can be illustrated by downloading CD-ROM ISOs and rendering chaos theory formulas while simultaneously instant messaging and posting on FaceBook what you ate... but in reality, what did you create?"
- DieHard, random forum troll at macos9lives.com

Offline IIO

  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1998
  • new to the forums
Re: delicate bending
« Reply #88 on: September 09, 2018, 07:32:12 AM »
oh, i misread, that was for recording/analysing? i´ve used praat once but it feels like trial and error.
"It is true that the "pre-emptive multitasking" advantage present in OS X can be illustrated by downloading CD-ROM ISOs and rendering chaos theory formulas while simultaneously instant messaging and posting on FaceBook what you ate... but in reality, what did you create?"
- DieHard, random forum troll at macos9lives.com

Offline dr bu

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 213
  • inconsistent soul
Re: delicate bending
« Reply #89 on: September 09, 2018, 10:04:47 AM »
i´ve used praat once but it feels like trial and error.
sure does. and its not real time.

[formant~] comes in PD too. if i were not so shy and lazy i would ask those guys to explain it..
bending is tuning

Offline IIO

  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1998
  • new to the forums
Re: delicate bending
« Reply #90 on: September 09, 2018, 11:45:05 AM »
i´ve made up this data by averaging the values from dozens of different sources.

russian 28 48
black 36 51
basso 38 63
baritone 43 68
tenor 48 70
alto 52 75
mezzo 55 78
soprano 60 81
falsetto 52 89

only when you stay in this frequency range, applying vowel formats will "work" as supposed to.



"It is true that the "pre-emptive multitasking" advantage present in OS X can be illustrated by downloading CD-ROM ISOs and rendering chaos theory formulas while simultaneously instant messaging and posting on FaceBook what you ate... but in reality, what did you create?"
- DieHard, random forum troll at macos9lives.com

Offline IIO

  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1998
  • new to the forums
Re: delicate bending
« Reply #91 on: September 09, 2018, 12:04:04 PM »
installed formant~

probably not difficutl to tell whart the output is - but i dont get the output data to change at all (when testing with the FM) wtf?

however, i think it´s LPC. i.e. not so much "fiddle" at all here, rather its own class.

on OSX you have plenty of alternatives... FTM, rtcmix, the zsa stuff...

p.s.
there is also an object called lpc from ircam, which is OS9 only. but it only does the lpc itself and leaves you with a bunch of IIR coefficients.

p.p.s
while you probably understand what my "justine" does :) , since the helpfile is missing i should add that you have to add the key as argument in order to get the right ratios (0-11 for C-Bb)
« Last Edit: September 09, 2018, 01:04:10 PM by IIO »
"It is true that the "pre-emptive multitasking" advantage present in OS X can be illustrated by downloading CD-ROM ISOs and rendering chaos theory formulas while simultaneously instant messaging and posting on FaceBook what you ate... but in reality, what did you create?"
- DieHard, random forum troll at macos9lives.com