there should be no neccessity to test applications or VST/RTAS plug-ins (any further).
I would greatly appreciate feedback on ANY download VST or otherwise (that does not already say "certified") since many items had to be restored last month and all downloads were re-organized into separate folders which left a higher chance for error (since some installs had multiple versions and I could not tell which files the links pointed to after they were lost). I think it is not much to ask for user feedback, so that we can be fix items for the next guy if something does not install or has poor instructions
but when it comes to TDM it would be nice to categorize/versionize stuff in case some of them will not work with any of the possible hardware configurations.
Yes, I would greatly appreciate that level of detail, and I would post the results, that would benefit all PT users
what would be nice is that new contributions are checked already by the uploader (if possible)
Most of the items from Mactron and myself were tested BEFORE uploading, but I do not have the time to re-download, make sure things extract correctly, and re-install and test. Also, the "up-loader" may make certain install assumptions that may not be clear to others, that is why I want to know all feedback so that we can fix archives and make easy instructions.
Sorry to differ with your opinion on this IIO, but this is a top priority for me since any downloads that do not work are useless to new members and should be removed or fixed.