Author Topic: The 2040 issue.  (Read 41326 times)

Offline OS923

  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 888
Re: The 2040 issue.
« Reply #20 on: July 23, 2018, 02:20:05 AM »
Solved.

Offline MacTron

  • Global Moderator
  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2116
  • keep it simple
Re: The 2040 issue.
« Reply #21 on: July 23, 2018, 07:11:35 AM »
Solved.
Great!
Can you please share the extension that fix this issue , attaching it to a post?
Please don't PM about things that are not private.

Offline DieHard

  • Global Moderator
  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2366
Re: The 2040 issue.
« Reply #22 on: July 23, 2018, 11:38:03 AM »
If will be available on a board here soon, for now, here is the link:

Pass: macos9lives
https://files.secureserver.net/0fUL0ehuuGJGbe

Offline part12studios

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 441
  • new to the forums
Re: The 2040 issue.
« Reply #23 on: February 01, 2020, 08:59:49 AM »
if the computer is offline we could just set the date to whatever right?  i mean i'll be amazed if any of these machine are still working in 20 years..  though not impossible..  if capacitors are changed and such its possible.  the oldest piece of music gear I have is my Akai S612 from 1984 and it's still in great shape and as far as i know it hasn't been serviced yet..  probably something i'll look into in this decade with various gear..   i had the caps changed on my Zoom 9030 (known issue they used bad caps) and my Amiga 1200 also got new caps 1991 era computer.. it was having power up issues.. but once caps were changed it powered up perfectly each time.  I sold that one but the one I still have got the same treatment but it hadn't shown signs of trouble yet. 

Offline IIO

  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4439
  • just a number
Re: The 2040 issue.
« Reply #24 on: February 02, 2020, 12:49:01 PM »
one of the main problems with a wrong fake date is copy protection schemes. another is that you eventually at least want to have the time right, which is only possible via internet, which would also attempt to the date.

for now just trust OS923 that it is almost solved.
insert arbitrary signature here

Offline Protools5LEGuy

  • Global Moderator
  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2749
Re: The 2040 issue.
« Reply #25 on: February 03, 2020, 05:13:15 AM »
Let´s see what linux folks had made to solve 2038 year bug on 32 bits systems

https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/29/355?anz=web


Looking for MacOS 9.2.4

Offline Protools5LEGuy

  • Global Moderator
  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2749
Looking for MacOS 9.2.4

Offline Protools5LEGuy

  • Global Moderator
  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2749
Re: The 2040 issue.
« Reply #27 on: May 02, 2020, 04:34:00 AM »
http://basalgangster.macgui.com/RetroMacComputing/The_Long_View/Entries/2020/4/5_Macintosh_Y2020.html

2020 issue on Mac OS 0.97 to Mac OS 8 solved

Quote
System version 9.x.

   System 9.0 was released in October, 1999, almost 9 months after the SuperBowl advertisement in which Apple bragged about being immune to things like the Y2k bug. Maybe at some time in the interim, somebody at Apple recognized the dishonesty in that commercial. Maybe not. For whatever reason, in System 9, the flags passed to ToggleDate by the ClockCDEF were altered in just the way we altered them above. System 9 is already patched. You can set the date however you like, within the limits of the Macintosh system clock. We are good to go till 2040.


Looking for MacOS 9.2.4

Offline IIO

  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4439
  • just a number
Re: The 2040 issue.
« Reply #28 on: May 02, 2020, 07:58:00 PM »

a guy in the fb group did the 2020 of 8.5 / 8.6 .

you´d basically patch the system file to match the OS9 version of it at a specific point.

System // data fork
change 3C608800 3863007E to 3C608000 3863007E

(scroll down)

http://basalgangster.macgui.com/RetroMacComputing/The_Long_View/Entries/2020/4/5_Macintosh_Y2020.html?fbclid=IwAR2WqSTAJi4b1R39fhC2uJMNlI65eEfoyk7Yc6wnTMNCrCoTQSoO2soP89I
insert arbitrary signature here

Offline teroyk

  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 623
  • -
Re: The 2040 issue.
« Reply #29 on: August 28, 2020, 07:04:20 AM »

Offline bfcastello

  • Enthusiast Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 30
  • New Member
Re: The 2040 issue.
« Reply #30 on: May 08, 2022, 02:55:59 PM »
Hi ppl

How to fix it for OS 9? Is there even a fix for that?

Offline bfcastello

  • Enthusiast Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 30
  • New Member
Re: The 2040 issue.
« Reply #31 on: November 13, 2022, 05:04:21 PM »
Hi ppl

How to fix it for OS 9? Is there even a fix for that?

Hello? I know we're good to go on OS 9 till 2040, but can't we extend it a bit more on OS 9.2.2? even Windows 3.11 can go to something like 2090 :P

Offline smilesdavis

  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 739
  • New Member
Looking for: Steinberg Cubase MAC Standard/Score v1-5 & Cubase Audio v1, Cubase Audio v2 for, Cubase Audio v3 for DAE/TDM => complete or in parts

Offline bfcastello

  • Enthusiast Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 30
  • New Member
Re: The 2040 issue.
« Reply #33 on: November 20, 2022, 11:42:20 AM »

a guy in the fb group did the 2020 of 8.5 / 8.6 .

you´d basically patch the system file to match the OS9 version of it at a specific point.

System // data fork
change 3C608800 3863007E to 3C608000 3863007E

(scroll down)

http://basalgangster.macgui.com/RetroMacComputing/The_Long_View/Entries/2020/4/5_Macintosh_Y2020.html?fbclid=IwAR2WqSTAJi4b1R39fhC2uJMNlI65eEfoyk7Yc6wnTMNCrCoTQSoO2soP89I

Now we just need the same kind of sorcery to make OS 9 go beyond 2040 :P

Offline smilesdavis

  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 739
  • New Member
Re: The 2040 issue.
« Reply #34 on: November 20, 2022, 12:21:25 PM »
by then its all emulation
Looking for: Steinberg Cubase MAC Standard/Score v1-5 & Cubase Audio v1, Cubase Audio v2 for, Cubase Audio v3 for DAE/TDM => complete or in parts

Offline Roman323

  • Enthusiast Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 93
  • New Member
Re: The 2040 issue.
« Reply #35 on: January 22, 2023, 08:06:15 PM »

a guy in the fb group did the 2020 of 8.5 / 8.6 .

you´d basically patch the system file to match the OS9 version of it at a specific point.

System // data fork
change 3C608800 3863007E to 3C608000 3863007E

(scroll down)

http://basalgangster.macgui.com/RetroMacComputing/The_Long_View/Entries/2020/4/5_Macintosh_Y2020.html?fbclid=IwAR2WqSTAJi4b1R39fhC2uJMNlI65eEfoyk7Yc6wnTMNCrCoTQSoO2soP89I

Now we just need the same kind of sorcery to make OS 9 go beyond 2040 :P

Who knows if we will be around in 2040 ? I know I will be 30 years older and probably not around anymore to even see if Mac OS 9 will still be around. I suppose if someone can get the Classic MAC OS source code, its possible to change the date.

Offline IIO

  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4439
  • just a number
Re: The 2040 issue.
« Reply #36 on: January 23, 2023, 08:09:58 AM »
Who knows if we will be around in 2040 ? I know I will be 30 years older


some would say it is 17 years.

the last 17 years went by quite fast, and i am afraid the next 17 will, too.

in 17 years we can break up all hacking groups and ask chatGTP´s grandchildren how to fix the 2040 date issue without the need of a forth decompiler, and we will hopefully also have 3D printers who can repair broken PSUs on the fly.
insert arbitrary signature here

Offline DieHard

  • Global Moderator
  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2366
Re: The 2040 issue.
« Reply #37 on: January 23, 2023, 08:24:08 AM »
Quote
in 17 years we can break up all hacking groups and ask chatGTP´s grandchildren how to fix the 2040 date issue without the need of a forth decompiler

Yep... this is not far from the truth.  There are many programmers saving countless hours getting chatGTP to spitout code, and I think that is great... but when you ask it to write a rock song about "hot" women it gives you the lecture not to objectify women, so in 2040, there will be no sexy models, no anger, no inequality, no passion, and no need to write about anything.   What a fucking disaster... that they create an awesome AI as a tool, only to fuck it up with social justice.  It's just a matter of time that they prosecute people based on asking inappropriate questions.

Offline IIO

  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4439
  • just a number
Re: The 2040 issue.
« Reply #38 on: January 23, 2023, 08:45:19 AM »
there will be two internets, one which only allows porn, racist comments and patriotic country music and one which forbids it. then you can choose between plague and cholera.

but did you know that 3 days ago (19.01.2023) was the day when marty mcfly and doc brown landed in the future in "back into the future?" it was a lie: there are no floating penny boards! :(
insert arbitrary signature here

Offline AssortedSordid

  • Newcomer
  • Posts: 3
  • New Member
Re: The 2040 issue.
« Reply #39 on: April 03, 2023, 09:21:16 PM »
Quote
in 17 years we can break up all hacking groups and ask chatGTP´s grandchildren how to fix the 2040 date issue without the need of a forth decompiler

Yep... this is not far from the truth.  There are many programmers saving countless hours getting chatGTP to spitout code, and I think that is great... but when you ask it to write a rock song about "hot" women it gives you the lecture not to objectify women, so in 2040, there will be no sexy models, no anger, no inequality, no passion, and no need to write about anything.   What a fucking disaster... that they create an awesome AI as a tool, only to fuck it up with social justice.  It's just a matter of time that they prosecute people based on asking inappropriate questions.

That’s why I like these old machines so much; not only the nostalgia but there’s no modern bullshit, only good times. Well, when your machine wants to play along, that is  :P
The versatile, honey-stickin' wild golden child
______________________________________

solace in darkness
across the threshold lies peace
thunderclap explodes