Author Topic: Mac OS ROM 2.3.1  (Read 20132 times)

Offline Philgood

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 411
Re: Mac OS ROM 2.3.1
« Reply #20 on: February 08, 2015, 10:12:51 AM »
Hi there.

I have the exact same machine. iMac G3 400Mhz with Firewire running 8.6. It came with that version of the OS installed. I could upload the Restore disc but it's german....
So i can confirm at least that you can get it working.
*G4 MDD 1.25GHz (Single 2003)* with 2x 80Gb harddrives, 1Gb RAM, Tascam US-428 and Edirol FA-101 USB/Firewire soundcards-*iMac G3 DV 400MHz* with installs from OS 8.6-OSX Tiger on different harddrives-*Powerbook G4 1.67Ghz* with new SSD ! Love it.

Offline MacTron

  • Global Moderator
  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2116
  • keep it simple
Re: Mac OS ROM 2.3.1
« Reply #21 on: February 08, 2015, 10:26:44 AM »
Just curious: What's the Mac Os ROM version number of your 8.6 System, please?

You can attach the Mac Os ROM only. Even if it is in German, it shouldn't be a problem, as ROM files, usually contains a very few text.
Please don't PM about things that are not private.

supernova777

  • Guest
Re: Mac OS ROM 2.3.1
« Reply #22 on: February 08, 2015, 01:02:24 PM »
personally i think there is more difference then JUST The rom file of these versions...
its best to have the full original disk.. to be sure

phil is the disc orange?

« Last Edit: February 08, 2015, 01:16:43 PM by chrisNova777 »

Offline wsidebottom

  • Valued Member
  • **
  • Posts: 12
  • new to the forums
Re: Mac OS ROM 2.3.1
« Reply #23 on: February 08, 2015, 06:09:27 PM »
the same thing was theorized about the sawtooth with the 2.5.1 rom and for me, it did not make a difference.. it still worked fine.

http://www.everymac.com/systems/by_capability/minimum-macos-supported.html
there is some 400 that work and some 400 that dont

please confirm your exact model
u can use your serial number on the back of the mac to do this

these work
http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/imac/specs/imac_dv_400.html
http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/imac/specs/imac_se_dv_400.html

these dont:
http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/imac/specs/imac_dv_400_indigo.html
http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/imac/specs/imac_400_indigo.html

I am guessing this is the reason why it wont work...
http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/imac/specs/imac_400_indigo.html
Even still, i don't see any technical reason why it should not work, given the specs are near identical except the older one has an ATI Rage Pro vs ATI Rage 128 VR 2D/3D
But this is Apple none the less.

What about re-flashing the rom with the older version? any thoughts?

here are two install + restore discs.. (found on this page: http://macintoshgarden.org/apps/mac-os-85-851-update)
u only need one of them
did u try one of these discs yet?

http://macintoshgarden.org/sites/macintoshgarden.org/files/apps/iMac86Instv1.1.ZIP
http://macintoshgarden.org/sites/macintoshgarden.org/files/apps/iMac86Restv1.1.ZIP

once u have the proper disc it will just work..
i think these images are the discs i just linked:


I actually did try them to no avail.

Hi there.

I have the exact same machine. iMac G3 400Mhz with Firewire running 8.6. It came with that version of the OS installed. I could upload the Restore disc but it's german....
So i can confirm at least that you can get it working.

Ok Phil, that sounds good.  my german is no good, but i think i will be able to work it out, or see if it works, but given the fact it is too new it probably wont work anyway.

Thanks all for help so far.  I probably should have looked harder too start with, though i am still thinking it should work or can be forced to work, somehow.
« Last Edit: February 08, 2015, 07:18:01 PM by wsidebottom »

supernova777

  • Guest
Re: Mac OS ROM 2.3.1
« Reply #24 on: February 09, 2015, 06:33:03 AM »
the german disc he has is the same as the one ive posted above.. only in german
this can be checked by the cd version + cd product code thats why i shared the image above
clearly showing this.. only on the german  the first character will be a D = deutsch

supernova777

  • Guest
Re: Mac OS ROM 2.3.1
« Reply #25 on: August 18, 2015, 12:15:05 AM »
I am guessing this is the reason why it wont work...
http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/imac/specs/imac_400_indigo.html
Even still, i don't see any technical reason why it should not work, given the specs are near identical except the older one has an ATI Rage Pro vs ATI Rage 128 VR 2D/3D
But this is Apple none the less.

yup - the rule stands - u cant easily run a lower mac os then the one that came installed on your mac when it was new..
so after all that work.. it turned out wsidebottom had a mac that was from 2001 and shipped with mac os 9.1 installed which he confused with an earlier model that shipped with 8.6
which is why he had problems trying to install 8.6 or 9.0.4

the only few exceptions i know of to that rule is our fw800-fw400 mac os 9 firmware hack..
and the 2007-2008 imacs being able to run tiger instead of leopard..
and the 2011 macbook pros being able to be rolled back to snow leopard 10.6.8

other then that i think most macs cant run previous os!!!

Offline DieHard

  • Global Moderator
  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2373
Re: Mac OS ROM 2.3.1
« Reply #26 on: August 18, 2015, 08:17:03 AM »
I remember killing a whole week trying to get Mac OS 8.6 to run on a Quicksilver for a specific client.. swapping MB boards, trying different ROMs, etc.  In the end, nothing worked... the "The Rule" as you mention it, Chris, was a hard lesson to learn. 

Apple always had a nasty habit of moving forward with ROM versions, It would have been nice to have had a "legacy" G4 ROM version for newer hardware, that would work with at least OS 8, but  guess that would have been too much work.

Thank God, guys like iMic, said "No thank you" and didn't give up when Apple said... "It's our way or the hiway"

Offline MacTron

  • Global Moderator
  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2116
  • keep it simple
Re: Mac OS ROM 2.3.1
« Reply #27 on: August 18, 2015, 11:12:14 AM »
I remember killing a whole week trying to get Mac OS 8.6 to run on a Quicksilver for a specific client.. swapping MB boards, trying different ROMs, etc.  In the end, nothing worked...
Yes,I have tried the same . That was on the really bad Mac Os 9.04 era ...
With Mac Os 9.2 there isn't any 8.6 need, but some 8.6 control panel or extension.

Quote
the "The Rule" as you mention it, Chris, was a hard lesson to learn. 

Yes, that's it.
The new ROMs usually contains drivers for new components in the new motherboards. But, we can boot a MDD with the Mac Os ROM v 8.8.1 even though it was created earlier than this machine. But this ROM don't have drivers for the ATA 100 on the MDD so, it only can boot from the ATA 66 or ATA 33 device.
Each ROM version have a "hard coded" the minimal System version that can be launch.
But Apple have forced ROM and System versions, sometimes, only to promote newer products, without real technical justification.

Quote
Apple always had a nasty habit of moving forward with ROM versions, It would have been nice to have had a "legacy" G4 ROM version for newer hardware, that would work with at least OS 8, but  guess that would have been too much work.

Thank God, guys like iMic, said "No thank you" and didn't give up when Apple said... "It's our way or the hiway"

If we transfer the new drivers from the newest ROMs and System files, and we follow iMic procedures probably we can boot any G4 with Mac Os 8.6 and Sawtooth 8.6 ROM.
« Last Edit: August 18, 2015, 11:41:46 AM by MacTron »
Please don't PM about things that are not private.

supernova777

  • Guest
Re: Mac OS ROM 2.3.1
« Reply #28 on: August 18, 2015, 12:00:29 PM »
i agree that it is possible to make it work, if the right person who understands how to edit the files was to do it.. but it may be a bit out of the "easily doable" spectrum... so much that it will never happen.